Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Richard Charles Adams |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 2:2020cv01247 |
| June 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| James A Teilborg |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Richard Charles Adams: Notice of Service re: Summons upon William Barr, US Attorney General (07/13/20); Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (07/13/20); Michael Bailey, US Attorney for the District of Arizona (07/10/20) on 07/13/20; 07/13/20; 07/10/20. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Domestic return receipts and certified mail receipts)(Caldwell, Mark) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Carol Clark appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Clark, Carol) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (REK) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff shall be responsible for service of the summons and complaint. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/26/2020. (CLB)
|
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: Within 60 days after the answer is filed, Plaintiff must file an Opening Brief. Defendant must file an Answering Brief within 30 days after service of Plaintiff's opening brief. Plaintiff may file a Reply Brief within 15 days after service of Defendants answering brief. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/24/20. (DXD)
|
| Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable James A Teiborg. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-1247-PHX-JAT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Richard Charles Adams. (Caldwell, Mark) (MCO) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Richard Charles Adams. (Caldwell, Mark) (MCO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW Claims for Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income Benefits 42 USC 401-434, 1381-1383f filed by Richard Charles Adams. (Caldwell, Mark) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Carol Clark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Charles Adams | |
| Represented By: | Mark Ross Caldwell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
