Radix Law PLC v. Fifth Third Bank
Plaintiff: Radix Law PLC
Defendant: Fifth Third Bank
Case Number: 2:2020cv01279
Filed: June 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Douglas L Rayes
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER pursuant to #20 Stipulation of Dismissal: This matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 1/5/2021. (RMV)
January 4, 2021 Filing 20 STIPULATION of Dismissal Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice by Radix Law PLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order of Dismissal)(Mann, Robert)
October 5, 2020 Filing 19 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Fifth Third Bank. (Pugel, Rachael)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time. FURTHER ORDERED extending the deadline for Defendant to file its Reply re: #7 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction to 10/5/2020. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 9/18/2020. (RMV)
September 17, 2020 Filing 17 *MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Fifth Third Bank. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Pugel, Rachael) *Modified to correct event/ linkage on 9/18/2020 (DXD).
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting Defendant Fifth Third Bank, N.A.'s #13 Motion to Continue Rule 16 Scheduling Conference. The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 9/22/2020 is vacated and will be reset after the court rules on the pending #7 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 9/16/2020. (MMO)
September 11, 2020 Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion re: #13 MOTION to Continue Rule 16 Scheduling Conference filed by Radix Law PLC. (Mann, Robert)
September 4, 2020 Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Response in Opposition filed by Radix Law PLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Mann, Robert)
September 1, 2020 Filing 13 MOTION to Continue Rule 16 Scheduling Conference by Fifth Third Bank. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Pugel, Rachael)
August 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #10 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss. The deadline for Plaintiff to file their Response to Defendant's #7 Motion to Dismiss is extended through and including 9/4/2020. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 8/6/2020. (MMO)
August 6, 2020 Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 9/23/2020 is VACATED AND RESET. Rule 16 Scheduling Conference reset for 9/22/2020 at 10:30 AM before Judge Douglas L Rayes. This matter will be held telephonically. The parties will be provided with call-in information via separate email. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MMO)
August 5, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss by Radix Law PLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mann, Robert)
July 24, 2020 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Radix Law PLC. (Mann, Robert)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER that Radix Law PLC file its Corporate Disclosure Statement within 10 business days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Radix Law PLC. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 7/22/2020. (Attachments: #1 Corporate Disclosure Form)(MMO)
July 7, 2020 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Nathaniel Lampley, Jr, and Joseph M Brunner on behalf of Defendant Fifth Third Bank. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
July 6, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Fifth Third Bank. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of George Isom)(Pugel, Rachael)
June 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 9/23/2020 at 04:30 PM in Courtroom 606, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Douglas L Rayes. The parties are directed to meet and confer at least 14 calendar days before the Scheduling Conference as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 6/29/2020. (MMO)
June 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 6/29/2020. (MMO)
June 29, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Radix Law PLC. (DLC)
June 29, 2020 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18425211. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-1279-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DLC)
June 29, 2020 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Fifth Third Bank. (Pugel, Rachael) (DLC)
June 29, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2020-053687. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18425211 filed by Fifth Third Bank. (Pugel, Rachael) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Declaration, #4 Exhibit)(DLC)
June 29, 2020 ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Exhibits A-D, Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration, Civil Coversheet upon Fifth Third Bank on 6/9/2020. (Original filed in the Maricopa County Superior Court on 6/9/2020). (DLC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Radix Law PLC v. Fifth Third Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Radix Law PLC
Represented By: Robert Neil Mann
Represented By: Jonathan B Frutkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fifth Third Bank
Represented By: Andrew Foster Halaby
Represented By: Joseph M Brunner
Represented By: Rachael Marie Peters Pugel
Represented By: Nathaniel Lampley, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?