Nutting v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Deborah Diane Nutting
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2020cv01319
Filed: July 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Michael T Liburdi
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2020 Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Deborah Diane Nutting: Notice of Service re: Summons upon William Barr, US Attorney General (07/20/20); Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (07/16/20); Michael Bailey, US Attorney for the District of Arizona (07/15/20) on 07/20/20; 07/16/20; 07/15/20. (Attachments: #1 Errata Domestic return receipts and certified mail receipts)(Caldwell, Mark)
July 21, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Inseon Jeong appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Jeong, In)
July 7, 2020 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (BAS)
July 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: Within 60 days after the answer is filed, Plaintiff must file an opening brief. Defendant must file an answering brief within 30 days after service of Plaintiff's opening brief. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within fifteen (15) days after service of Defendants answering brief. Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 7/6/20. (DXD)
July 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied. Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee within 7 days of this Order, or the Clerk of the Court shall dismiss this case (without prejudice) and enter judgment accordingly. See the attached order for additional information. Signed by Judge Michael T. Liburdi on 7/6/2020. (RMW)
July 6, 2020 Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T Liburdi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-01319-PHX-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAC)
July 6, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Deborah Diane Nutting. (Caldwell, Mark) (BAC)
July 6, 2020 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Deborah Diane Nutting. (Caldwell, Mark) (BAC)
July 6, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Deborah Diane Nutting. (Caldwell, Mark) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC)
July 6, 2020 Civil Case Opening Fee Received: $ 400.00 receipt number 0970-18444636. (Caldwell, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nutting v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: In Seon Jeong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah Diane Nutting
Represented By: Mark Ross Caldwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?