Goff #186716 v. Coleman et al
Shawn Charles Goff |
Unknown Morris, Unknown Kimble, David Shinn, Unknown Thompson, Anthony Coleman and Gerald Thompson |
2:2020cv01557 |
July 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
James F Metcalf (PS) |
Douglas L Rayes |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER - The First Amended Complaint (Doc. #11 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 9/25/2020. (LAD) |
Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Anthony Coleman, Unknown Kimble, Unknown Morris, David Shinn, Gerald Thompson filed by Shawn Charles Goff.(SLQ) (17 pages). |
Filing 10 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Shawn Charles Goff. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 8/14/2020. (LAD) |
Filing 9 ORDER - Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #7 ) is granted. The Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed for failure to comply with Rules 8 and 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 8/14/2020. (LAD) |
Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Shawn Charles Goff. (SLQ) (4 pages). |
Filing 7 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Shawn Charles Goff. (SLQ) (2 pages). |
Filing 6 ORDER - Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied without prejudice. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 8/6/2020. (LAD) |
Filing 5 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (SST) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SST) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Shawn Charles Goff. (SST) (3 pages) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Shawn Charles Goff. (SST) (2 pages) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Shawn Charles Goff. (SST) (18 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.