Quintero #339148 v. Armstrong et al
| Oscar Quintero |
| Benjamin Armstrong, Lynn Fazz, Eugene Marquez and Michael Breeze |
| 2:2020cv01647 |
| August 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Morrissey (PS) |
| James A Teilborg |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filing fee: $400, receipt number PHX222719 - PAID IN FULL. (REK) |
Filing 4
ORDER: Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/18/2020. (REK)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (SST) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SST) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Oscar Quintero. (SST) (7 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
