Santillanes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Martha Santillanes
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2020cv02011
Filed: October 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2020 Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Martha Santillanes: Notice of Service re: Summons upon William Barr, US Attorney General (11/12/2020); Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (11/9/2020); Michael Bailey, US Attorney for the District of Arizona (11/9/2020) on 11/12/2020; 11/9/2020; 11/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service)(Caldwell, Mark)
November 16, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Marcelo Illarmo appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Illarmo, Marcelo)
October 22, 2020 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (BAS)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER issued. See attached Order. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 10/21/2020. (JAMA)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on January 20, 2021. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 10/21/2020. (JAMA)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Plaintiff is responsible for service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendant pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and may serve the Summons and Complaint by waiver under Rule 4(d). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 10/21/20. (EJA)
October 19, 2020 Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-02011-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached.(BAC)
October 19, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Martha Santillanes. (Caldwell, Mark) (BAC)
October 19, 2020 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Martha Santillanes. (Caldwell, Mark) (BAC)
October 19, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Martha Santillanes. (Caldwell, Mark) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Santillanes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Marcelo N Illarmo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martha Santillanes
Represented By: Mark Ross Caldwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?