Einstein Associates LLC v. DAP Industries LLC
Einstein Associates LLC |
DAP Industries LLC |
2:2020cv02184 |
November 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
James A Teilborg |
Property Rights: Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER (STANDARD CIVIL TRACK) - Plaintiff must file a notice within 7 days of any Defendant answering (or, in a removed case, within 7 days of removal if any Defendant answered prior to removal) that the parties are ready for a Rule 16 scheduling conference. The Court will issue an order setting a Rule 16 conference. FURTHER ORDERED that full compliance with Rule 26(f) and the Courts order setting a Rule 16 conference is expected prior to the date of the Rule 16 Conference. FURTHER ORDERED that full compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 (filing of a Corporate Disclosure Statement) is required by plaintiff(s) and defendant(s), if applicable. Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 11/17/20. (NKS) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Ben T Lila on behalf of Plaintiff Einstein Associates LLC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Einstein Associates LLC, #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Einstein Associates LLC. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SLQ) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to DAP Industries LLC. (SLQ). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 5 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18877613. This case has been assigned to the Honorable James A Teilborg. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-02184-PHX-JAT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SLQ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing - Copyright, Trademark or Patent Information filed by Einstein Associates LLC. (SLQ) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Einstein Associates LLC. (SLQ) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Einstein Associates LLC. (SLQ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18877613 filed by Einstein Associates LLC (by attorney Ben Lila). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SLQ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Einstein Associates LLC v. DAP Industries LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DAP Industries LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Einstein Associates LLC | |
Represented By: | Ben T Lila |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.