Jackson v. Phoenix, City of et al
| Aaron Jackson |
| Cody J Baker, Phoenix, City of and Tyler Luna |
| 2:2021cv00221 |
| February 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Susan M Brnovich |
| Michelle H Burns |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42:1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Aaron Jackson: Return of Service re: complaint, summons upon Cody Baker on 3-12-21. (Tate, Elizabeth) |
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Case Management Conference is set for May 25, 2021 at 11:00 AM, in Courtroom 303, Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Federal Courthouse, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2118. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 3/11/2021. (WLP)
|
| Filing 9 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Cody J Baker, Tyler Luna, Phoenix, City of. (Hyde, Robert) |
| Filing 8 Defendants' ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Cody J Baker, Tyler Luna, Phoenix, City of.(Hyde, Robert) |
| Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Aaron Jackson: Return of Service re: complaint, summons upon City of Phoenix on 02-11-21. (Tate, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Aaron Jackson: Return of Service re: complaint, summons upon Tyler Luna on 02-21-21. (Tate, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Cody J Baker, Tyler Luna, Phoenix, City of. (SLQ). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: (1) Plaintiff must either serve each Defendant or seek a waiver of service for each Defendant. (2) If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). (3) Defendants must answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (4) Any answer or response must state the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed. The Court may strike any answer, response, or other motion or paper that does not identify the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed. (5) This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). (6) This matter is assigned to the standard track pursuant to Rule 16.2(b)(3) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. (7) If properly completed, the Clerk of Court must issue the proposed Summonses filed at Doc. #2 . Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 2/10/21. (SLQ)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MYE) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Aaron Jackson. (Tate, Elizabeth) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MYE) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19145276 filed by Aaron Jackson. (Tate, Elizabeth) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
