Canon Incorporated v. Kuhlmann Enterprises Incorporated
Plaintiff: Canon Incorporated
Defendant: Kuhlmann Enterprises Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2021cv00387
Filed: March 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Susan M Brnovich
Nature of Suit: Property Rights: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall have until June 7, 2021 to file an answer. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 4/9/21. (MAW)
April 8, 2021 Filing 12 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint by Canon Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Garrison, Sean)
March 19, 2021 Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Canon Incorporated: Proof of Service re: Summons, Complaint, and related ancillary documents upon Kuhlmann Enterprises, Inc. on 3/17/2021. (Garrison, Sean)
March 12, 2021 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Michael P Sandonato on behalf of Plaintiff Canon Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on June 7, 2021. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 3/09/2021. (ESG)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 3/09/2021. (ESG)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Any motions, responses or replies filed for which a courtesy copy is not delivered to the Court, as required, will be stricken and not considered. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 3/9/2021. (ESG)
March 8, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing - Copyright, Trademark or Patent Information filed by Canon Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Supplement A0120 Patent Report, #2 Supplement A0120 Addendum)(Garrison, Sean)
March 8, 2021 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Kuhlmann Enterprises Incorporated. (REM). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
March 8, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS Submitted by Canon Incorporated.(Garrison, Sean) (REM)
March 8, 2021 Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER: Request for Copyright, Trademark, or Patent Information. This case has been designated as a copyright, trademark, or patent case. The Clerk's Office is required to provide information to the Patent and Trademark Office and/or Copyright Office regarding this case. Attached to this docket entry are the required form(s) that must be completed. Plaintiff shall complete the form that is applicable to this particular case. In some cases, you may need to complete both forms.Within seven (7) days, Plaintiff must submit the required form(s) to the Clerk's Office. Please complete the form and file it with the Court using the specific event: Notice of Filing - Copyright, Trademark or Patent Information, found under the Other Filings header. Please DO NOT mail the form directly to the Patent or Copyright Office. The Clerk's Office will submit the form. If neither form is required for this case, please file a notice indicating the reason the form is not necessary and use the event listed above. This form must be updated if additional patents, copyrights, or trademarks are alleged in a responsive pleading (Attachments: #1 AO 121)(REM)
March 8, 2021 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19229144. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M. Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-00387-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REM)
March 8, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Canon Incorporated. (REM)
March 8, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19229144 filed by Canon Incorporated.(Garrison, Sean) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Civil Cover Sheet, #12 CvrshtAttchA)(REM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Canon Incorporated v. Kuhlmann Enterprises Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kuhlmann Enterprises Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Canon Incorporated
Represented By: Sean David Garrison
Represented By: Michael P Sandonato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?