Vitasek v. Shinn et al.
Arthur L Vitasek |
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
2:2021cv00436 |
March 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
John Z Boyle (PS) |
John Z Boyle |
Michael T Liburdi |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: The Motion (Doc. #13 ) is granted to the extent provided in this Order. Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #8 ) is withdrawn. Petitioner shall have up to, and including, July 2, 2021 to file a reply in support of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (doc. #1 ). See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 05/07/2021. (MHW) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Withdraw Petitioners Motion for Summary Judgment and MOTION for 60 Day Extension of Time to File Reply by Arthur L Vitasek. (2 pages) (MHW) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re: #9 MOTION for Discovery (CPS Records) filed by Attorney General of the State of Arizona, David Shinn. (Kelly, Tanja) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re: #8 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Attorney General of the State of Arizona, David Shinn. (Kelly, Tanja) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) and Exhibits A-LL by Attorney General of the State of Arizona, David Shinn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-D, #2 Exhibit Exhibit E, #3 Exhibit Exhibits F-N, #4 Exhibit Exhibits O-P, #5 Exhibit Exhibits Q-X, #6 Exhibit Exhibits Y-LL)(Kelly, Tanja) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Discovery (CPS Records) Ordered by the Superior Courts but the Attorney General's Office Refused to Turn Over by Arthur L Vitasek. (17 pages) (MHW) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Tanja Karin Kelly on behalf of Attorney General of the State of Arizona, David Shinn. (Kelly, Tanja) |
Filing 8 *WITHDRAWN pursuant to #14 Order -- MOTION for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal Habeas Corpus Practice and Procedure 17.3 by Arthur L Vitasek. (21 pages) (MHW) *Modified on 5/7/2021 (MHW). |
Filing 6 Arizona Attorney General Service Order (2254). Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 04/08/2021. (Attachments: #1 Petition Part 1, #2 Petition Part 2, #3 Petiton Part 3)(MHW) |
Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number PHX227560. (MHW) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Immediate Unconditional Release Hearing by Arthur L Vitasek. (14 pages) (MHW) |
Filing 3 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Petitioner a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas). See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 03/23/2021. (MHW) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MHW) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Arthur L Vitasek. (181 pages) (Attachments: #1 Petition Part 2, #2 Petition Part 3, #3 Petition Part 4, #4 Exhibit Part 1, #5 Exhibit Part 2, #6 Envelope)(MHW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.