Allen v. Payne et al
Charles Richard Allen, Jr. |
Alex Eisdorfer, Pascal Koulemou, Amber Butt, Sheridyn Miller, Shanda Payne, Alexandra Coker, Ernest Sunjo, Kevin Galbreath and Shaun Anderson |
2:2021cv00937 |
May 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Michael T Morrissey (PS) |
Steven P Logan |
Prisoner: Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER: Plaintiff has 30 days from the filing date of this Order to pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file an Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. If Plaintiff fails to pay the filing and administrative fees or file an Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 6/2/21. (Attachments: #1 Application Form) (SST) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Charles Richard Allen, Jr. (5 Pages and Envelope) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.