Mendez v. Progrexion Teleservices Incorporated
Plaintiff: Ericka Mendez
Defendant: Progrexion Teleservices Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2021cv02071
Filed: December 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Dominic W Lanza
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 16(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court will issue a scheduling order after receiving the parties' Rule 26 (f) report. After reviewing the Rule 26(f) report, the Court will set a case management conference if meeting with the parties appears necessary or helpful. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows: The parties are directed to meet, confer, and develop a Rule 26(f) Joint Case Management Report, which must be filed no later than March 4, 2022 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 2/4/22. (MAW)
February 4, 2022 Filing 15 ANSWER to #14 Amended Complaint by Progrexion Teleservices Incorporated.(Shardonofsky, Esteban)
February 3, 2022 Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Ericka Mendez.(Nowicki, Nicholas)
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: "Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) is the appropriate mechanism where a plaintiff desires to eliminate an issue, or one or more but less than all of several claims, but without dismissing as to any of the defendants." Ethridge v. Harbor House Rest., 861 F.2d 1389, 1392 (9th Cir. 1988). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties' stipulation to dismiss certain claims (Doc. #12 ) is denied. Plaintiff can amend without seeking the Court's leave with the opposing parties' written consent. LRCiv 15.1. Ordered by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 2/2/22. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAW)
February 2, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE re: of Partial Dismissal by Ericka Mendez . (Nowicki, Nicholas)
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of deadline (Doc. #10 ) is granted. The deadline for Defendant to respond to the complaint is extended to February 4, 2022. Ordered by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 1/25/22. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAW)
January 19, 2022 Filing 10 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Progrexion Teleservices Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hernandez, Laura)
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of deadline (Doc. #7 ) is granted. The deadline for Defendant to respond to the complaint is extended to January 21, 2022. Ordered by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 1/3/22. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAW)
December 30, 2021 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Progrexion Teleservices Incorporated identifying Corporate Parent Progrexion Holdings Incorporated for Progrexion Teleservices Incorporated. (Hernandez, Laura)
December 30, 2021 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Laura A Hernandez on behalf of Defendant Progrexion Teleservices Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
December 29, 2021 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Esteban Shardonofsky on behalf of Defendant Progrexion Teleservices Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
December 28, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint Unopposed Motion to Extend The Deadline for Defendant to Respond to Complaint (First Request) by Progrexion Teleservices Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shardonofsky, Esteban)
December 15, 2021 Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Ericka Mendez: Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, and Preliminary Order upon Progrexion Teleservices Incorporated on 12-10-2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Nowicki, Nicholas)
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PRELIMINARY ORDER: IT IS ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order on Defendant(s) and file a notice of service with the Clerk of Court; 2. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, on March 8, 2022, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 12/8/21. (MAW)
December 7, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Progrexion Teleservices Incorporated. (ARC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
December 7, 2021 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-20131444. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-2071-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC)
December 7, 2021 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Ericka Mendez. (Nowicki, Nicholas) (ARC)
December 7, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-20131444 filed by Ericka Mendez. (Nowicki, Nicholas) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mendez v. Progrexion Teleservices Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ericka Mendez
Represented By: Nicholas Reese Nowicki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progrexion Teleservices Incorporated
Represented By: Esteban Shardonofsky
Represented By: Laura A Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?