Butler v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Tyler B Butler |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 2:2022cv00045 |
| January 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan M Brnovich |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Daniel Talbert appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Talbert, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 *SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Tyler B Butler: Certified Mail Receipt re: Summons and Complaint upon Commissioner, Social Security Administration on 01/21/2022, U.S. Attorney for the District of Arizona on 01/20/2022, and U.S. Attorney General on 01/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Service upon Attorney General, #2 Exhibit Service upon U.S. Attorney, #3 Exhibit Service upon Office of General Counsel)(Schiffman, Anna) *Modified to include additional parties served on 2/2/2022 (REK). |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(BAS) |
Filing 5
ORDER that the #2 application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, without prepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security therefore is granted. Plaintiff shall be responsible for service by waiver or of the summons and complaint. The parties must fully comply with the following deadlines and procedures: Opening Brief due within 60 days after the answer is filed; Answering Brief due within 30 days after service of Plaintiff's opening brief; Reply Brief due within 15 days after service of Defendant's brief. See attached order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 1/11/2022. (ESG)
|
| Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M. Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-00045-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REM) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Tyler B Butler. (Schiffman, Anna) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(REM) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Tyler B Butler.(Schiffman, Anna) (REM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Tyler B Butler.(Schiffman, Anna) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(REM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Butler v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tyler B Butler | |
| Represented By: | Anna Tucker Schiffman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Daniel P Talbert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
