Lallande v. Maricopa County Board of Supervisors et al
| Thomas Joseph Lallande, IV |
| Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Cara Christ, Vincent Gales and Paul Penzone |
| 2:2022cv00516 |
| March 31, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Deborah M Fine (PS) |
| Susan M Brnovich |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER that Plaintiff's April 29, 2022 #10 Motion for Leave to Change Parties is denied. This case must remain closed. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 5/9/2022. (ESG)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Amend/Correct (Titled: Motion for Leave to Change Parties) #1 Complaint by Thomas Joseph Lallande, IV. (3 Pages) (REK) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's order filed April 25, 2022, Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed for failure to state a claim. This dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (REK) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Thomas Joseph Lallande, IV. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 4/25/2022. (REK)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #5 is granted. The Complaint #1 is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1), and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. The Clerk of Court must make an entry on the docket stating that the dismissal for failure to state a claim may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The docket shall reflect that the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), has considered whether an appeal of this decision would be taken in good faith and certifies that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for the reasons stated in the Order and because there is no arguable factual or legal basis for an appeal. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 4/25/2022. (REK)
|
| Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Thomas Joseph Lallande, IV. (1 page) (WLP) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Thomas Joseph Lallande, IV. (3 pages) (WLP) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Plaintiff's #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is denied without prejudice. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas). Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 4/06/2022. (ESG)
|
| Filing 12 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Thomas Joseph Lallande, IV. (1 page) (WLP) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (LAD) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Thomas Joseph Lallande, IV. (LAD) (3 pages) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Thomas Joseph Lallande, IV. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LAD) (10 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
