Rahimi v. United States Department of State et al
Ramin Rahimi |
United States Department of State, United States Embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan, Antony Blinken and Angela Aggeler |
2:2022cv01106 |
June 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Douglas L Rayes |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to #9 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, Civil case terminated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MMO) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Ramin Rahimi. (Hacking, James) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for James O Hacking, III on behalf of Plaintiff Ramin Rahimi. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: #7 Order,,, Set Deadlines,, by Plaintiff Ramin Rahimi. (Hacking, James) |
Filing 7 ORDER: Pending before the Court is attorney James Hacking's seventh Application of Attorney for Admission to Practice Pro Hac Vice Pursuant to LRCiv 83.1(b)(2) (Application). IT IS ORDERED that Mr. Hacking show cause within 10 days of the date of this Order why his Application of Attorney for Admission to Practice Pro Hac Vice Pursuant to LRCiv 83.1(b)(2) should not be denied based on his failure to comply with this Court's Local Rules despite being notified about his prior deficiencies [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 7/7/22. (MAW) |
Filing 6 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 6/30/2022. (RMV) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Writ of Mandamus filed by Ramin Rahimi. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(1) - Forms of Papers: Please note for future filings; Attorney information must be typed in the upper left corner. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (ARC) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Angela Aggeler, Antony Blinken, United States Department of State, United States Embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(ARC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-20826668. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-1106-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Ramin Rahimi. (Hacking, James) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(ARC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for WRIT OF MANDAMUS. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-20826668 filed by Ramin Rahimi. (Hacking, James) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.