Fenty v. Penzone et al
| Jason Phillip Fenty |
| Paul Penzone, Unknown Party, Maricopa, County of and Maricopa County Board of Supervisors |
| 2:2022cv01183 |
| July 14, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| John Z Boyle |
| Diane J Humetewa |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: The reference to Magistrate Judge Boyle is withdrawn only with respect to Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration on Count Four (Doc. #8 ). All other matters in this action remain with Magistrate Judge Boyle for disposition as appropriate. Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration on Count Four (Doc. #8 ) is denied. (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 8/29/22. (SST)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion (doc. #7 ) is granted. Plaintiff's deadline to return service packets, as set forth in the Court's August 5, 2022 Order (doc. #5 ), is extended through September 16, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 8/19/22. (SST)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Reconsideration on Count Four re: #5 Order (Service Packet) by Jason Phillip Fenty. (SST) (2 pages) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Extend Time to Return Service Packet by Jason Phillip Fenty. (SST) (2 pages) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE - Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Jason Phillip Fenty. See attached for complete information. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 8/5/22. (SMH)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER (Service Packet) - IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is granted. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $14.26. Counts Four and Five are dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Doe, Maricopa County, and Maricopa County Board of Supervisors are dismissed without prejudice. Defendant Penzone must answer Counts One through Three. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the Complaint (Doc. #1 ), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendant Penzone. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. The United States Marshal will not provide service of process if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); LRCiv 16.2(b)(2)(B)(ii). This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle. See attached for complete information. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 8/5/22. (SMH)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jason Phillip Fenty. (9 Pages) (REK) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jason Phillip Fenty. (2 Pages) (REK) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Jason Phillip Fenty. (14 Pages and Envelope) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
