Brown v. Ducey et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Angelo Brown
Defendant: Doug Ducey, David Shinn, John McAdorey, D Quintero, E Rodriguez, Beatriz Martin and R Estrada
Case Number: 2:2022cv01623
Filed: September 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Deborah M Fine (PS)
Referring Judge: Michael T Liburdi
2 Judge: Steven P Logan
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. IT IS ORDERED that on or before December 20, 2022, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/26/22. (MJW)
October 14, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION to Extend Deadline for Submission of Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner (Civil Complaint) by Christopher Angelo Brown. (SST) (2 pages)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied without prejudice. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas). (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/5/22. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (SST)
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Honorable Michael T. Liburdi recuses himself from this action and that this case is reassigned by random draw to the Honorable Steven P. Logan for all further proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all future pleadings and papers submitted for filing shall bear the following complete case number: CV-22-01623-PHX-SPL. Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 10/4/22. (SST)
September 29, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF PARTY'S CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Christopher Angelo Brown: #313423, ELOY-AZ-LP-CC LA PALMA CORRECTIONAL CENTER, 5501 N La Palma Rd, Eloy, AZ 85131 (CLM) (2 pages)
September 22, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SST)
September 22, 2022 Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Christopher Angelo Brown. (SST) (7 pages)
September 22, 2022 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Christopher Angelo Brown. (SST) (2 pages)
September 22, 2022 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Christopher Angelo Brown. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (SST) (14 pages)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Ducey et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Angelo Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doug Ducey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Shinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John McAdorey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D Quintero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beatriz Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R Estrada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?