Mars v. Heisner
| Terrell Maurice Mars |
| Russell Heisner |
| 2:2022cv01933 |
| November 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| John Z Boyle |
| Steven P Logan |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 *ANSWER to #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) by Russell Heisner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Hemann, Lisa) *Modified to change from motion to answer on 1/4/2023 (MAP). |
| Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED: Certified Mail Receipt re: Petition/Order/Summons upon Russell Heisner on 11/21/22. (SST) |
| Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED: Certified Mail Receipt re: Petition/Order/Summons upon U.S. Attorney General on 11/22/22. (SST) |
| Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED: Certified Mail Receipt re: Petition/Order/Summons upon U.S. Attorney for the District of Arizona (attn: civil processing clerk) on 11/21/22. (SST) |
Filing 4
ORDER: The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Summons, the Petition (Doc. #1 ) and this Order upon the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona by certified mail addressed to the civil process clerk at the office of the United States Attorney pursuant to Rule 4(i)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court must also send by certified mail a copy of the Summons, the Petition, and this Order to the United States Attorney General pursuant to Rule 4(i)(1)(B) and to Respondent pursuant to Rule 4(i)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Respondent Russell Heisner must answer the Petition within 20 days of the date of service. Respondent shall not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer without first showing cause as to why an answer is inadequate. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 11/16/22. (SST)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (WLP) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 200003044. PAID IN FULL. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (WLP) . |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) filed by Terrell Maurice Mars. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (23 pages) (WLP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mars v. Heisner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Terrell Maurice Mars | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Russell Heisner | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
