Doe v. Amazon Incorporated
| John Doe |
| Amazon Incorporated |
| 2:2023cv00910 |
| May 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John J Tuchi |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on August 23, 2023. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, along with the Complaint and Summons, Plaintiff shall serve on Defendant the Motion for Leave of Court to Proceed Under a Pseudonym (Doc. #3 ) and this Order. Defendant shall have 14 days from the date of service to file any Response to Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. #3 ). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 5/30/2023. (JAMA)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 5/30/2023. (JAMA)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS) |
| Filing 5 Filing fee paid, receipt number 200006552. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J. Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV23-00910-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAS) |
| Filing 4 Verification of John Doe Plaintiff by John Doe re: #3 MOTION Motion for Leave of Court to Proceed under a Psuedonym re: #1 Complaint. (BAS) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave of Court to Proceed under a Psuedonym re: #1 Complaint by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(BAS) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by John Doe. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (BAS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 200006552 filed by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Doe v. Amazon Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Doe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amazon Incorporated | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
