Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Stephanie Nicole Martinez |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 2:2023cv02142 |
| October 16, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| G Murray Snow |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Oscar Gonzalez de Llano appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Gonzalez de Llano, Oscar) |
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: Within 30 days after the answer is filed, Plaintiff must file an opening brief. Defendant must file an answering brief within 30 days after service of Plaintiff's opening. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within 14 days after service of Defendant's brief. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 10/16/23. (DXD)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DXD) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk shall issue Notice re Social Security Case Service notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 10/16/23. (DXD)
|
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-2142-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Stephanie Nicole Martinez. (Fern, Sarah) (MCO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW Claims for Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income Benefit filed by Stephanie Nicole Martinez. (Fern, Sarah) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stephanie Nicole Martinez | |
| Represented By: | Robin Michelle Larkin |
| Represented By: | Sarah Nicole Fern |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Oscar Gonzalez de Llano |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
