Bailey v. Maricopa, County of et al
| John Bailey |
| Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Barry Roska and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2024cv00823 |
| April 9, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan M Brnovich |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER This matter will, without further Order of this Court, be dismissed with prejudice within 60 days of the date of this order unless a stipulation to dismiss is filed prior to the dismissal date. All pending hearings and deadlines are vacated. All pending motions are found to be moot. The Clerk is directed to terminate this matter on July 16, 2024 without further leave of Court. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 5/17/2024. (ESG)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by John Bailey. (Goad, Jeremy) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Remand to State Court by John Bailey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Goad, Jeremy) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Telephonic Case Management Conference is set for 5/24/2024 at 9:15 a.m. (15 minutes allowed). The parties will receive dial-in instructions for connecting to the teleconference via electronic mail prior to the hearing. The parties are directed to meet and confer at least 10 days before the Case Management Conference as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). The parties shall jointly file the Case Management Report with the Clerk not less than seven days before the Case Management Conference. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 4/11/2024. (ESG)
|
|
Filing 3
PRELIMINARY ORDER this matter having recently come before this Court, the parties are advised of the following preliminary policies and procedures that will govern these proceedings and are ordered as follows. Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order on Defendant(s) and file notice of service with the Clerk of Court. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 4/11/2024. (ESG)
|
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22930108. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-00823-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2024-004171. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22930108 filed by Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Barry Roska. (submitted by Courtney Glynn) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(REK) |
| ***State Court record received on 4/09/2024***SERVICE EXECUTED filed by John Bailey: Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, and Certificate of Arbitration upon Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County, and Barry Roska on 3/06/2024.***Certificates of Service filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 3/12/2024, docketed in U.S. District Court on 4/09/2024 for case management purposes.*** (REK) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
