Evergreen Telemetry LLC v. Fieldpiece Instruments Incorporated
Evergreen Telemetry LLC |
Fieldpiece Instruments Incorporated |
2:2024cv02814 |
October 17, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
Steven P Logan |
Property Rights: Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE re: Certificate of Service of Preliminary Order on Defendant Fieldpiece Instruments, Inc. by Evergreen Telemetry LLC . (Anderson, Daniel) |
![]() |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Evergreen Telemetry LLC. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Attorney must update PACER account to match law firm information on pleading: Daniel R Pote. Law firm name listed on pleading: Newman Jones PLLC. Law firm in CM-ECF Account: Quarles & Brady LLP. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Fieldpiece Instruments Incorporated. (REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 5 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-23572100. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-02814-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Submitted by Evergreen Telemetry LLC. (submitted by Daniel Anderson) (REK) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing - AO 120 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Patent or Trademark filed by Evergreen Telemetry LLC. (submitted by Daniel Anderson) (REK) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by Evergreen Telemetry LLC. (submitted by Daniel Anderson) (REK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-23572100 filed by Evergreen Telemetry LLC. (submitted by Daniel Anderson) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Evergreen Telemetry LLC v. Fieldpiece Instruments Incorporated | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Fieldpiece Instruments Incorporated | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Evergreen Telemetry LLC | |
Represented By: | Michael K Kelly |
Represented By: | Daniel R Pote |
Represented By: | Daniel Joseph Anderson |
Represented By: | Christine N Jones |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.