Cadena v. Nextiva Incorporated
Danielle Cadena |
Nextiva Incorporated |
2:2024cv03198 |
November 15, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
Diane J Humetewa |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Danielle Cadena. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Texts, #2 Attachment Unpub Opinion)(Armstrong, Emily) |
Filing 16 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Danielle Cadena. (Armstrong, Emily) |
Filing 15 Additional Attachments to Main Document (redacted State Court Complaint) re: #1 Notice of Removal by Plaintiff Danielle Cadena. (REK) |
![]() |
Filing 13 *Filed at #15 LODGED Proposed Redacted Complaint re: #12 MOTION to Seal Document #1 Notice of Removal, (Portions of Complaint). Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation to Seal is granted. Filed by Danielle Cadena. (Armstrong, Emily) Modified on 12/26/2024 (REK). |
Filing 12 MOTION to Seal Document #1 Notice of Removal, (Portions of Complaint) by Danielle Cadena. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Armstrong, Emily) |
![]() |
Filing 10 STIPULATION to Extend Deadline to Respond re: #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Danielle Cadena. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Matheson, Michelle) |
Filing 9 *MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Nextiva Incorporated. (Holden, Helen) *Modified event on 12/16/2024 (KJ). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Unopposed) by Nextiva Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Holden, Helen) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-23677326. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Diane J Humetewa. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-03198-PHX-DJH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by Nextiva Incorporated. (submitted by Helen Holden) (REK) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2024-029220. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-23677326 filed by Nextiva Incorporated. (submitted by Helen Holden) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cadena v. Nextiva Incorporated | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Danielle Cadena | |
Represented By: | Michelle Ray Matheson |
Represented By: | Emily Dierberg Armstrong |
Represented By: | David Paul Matheson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nextiva Incorporated | |
Represented By: | Robert Mark Warzel |
Represented By: | Helen Rubenstein Holden |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.