Cadena v. Nextiva Incorporated
Plaintiff: Danielle Cadena
Defendant: Nextiva Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2024cv03198
Filed: November 15, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Diane J Humetewa
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2025 Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Danielle Cadena. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Texts, #2 Attachment Unpub Opinion)(Armstrong, Emily)
January 9, 2025 Filing 16 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Danielle Cadena. (Armstrong, Emily)
December 26, 2024 Filing 15 Additional Attachments to Main Document (redacted State Court Complaint) re: #1 Notice of Removal by Plaintiff Danielle Cadena. (REK)
December 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Seal #12 is granted, as stated herein. The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to seal Defendant's Notice of Removal #1 , which includes Plaintiff's unredacted Complaint (id. at 619), and file Plaintiff's redacted Complaint #13 . Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 12/26/2024. (REK)
December 18, 2024 Filing 13 *Filed at #15 LODGED Proposed Redacted Complaint re: #12 MOTION to Seal Document #1 Notice of Removal, (Portions of Complaint). Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation to Seal is granted. Filed by Danielle Cadena. (Armstrong, Emily) Modified on 12/26/2024 (REK).
December 18, 2024 Filing 12 MOTION to Seal Document #1 Notice of Removal, (Portions of Complaint) by Danielle Cadena. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Armstrong, Emily)
December 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting the Stipulated Request to Extend Deadline to Respond to Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #10 ). Plaintiff shall have until 1/13/2025 to Respond to the Motion to Dismiss. The parties are on notice that future requests for extensions that do not state good cause will be summarily denied, notwithstanding the parties' stipulation. ORDERED by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 12/18/2024. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (LFIG)
December 18, 2024 Filing 10 STIPULATION to Extend Deadline to Respond re: #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Danielle Cadena. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Matheson, Michelle)
December 13, 2024 Filing 9 *MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Nextiva Incorporated. (Holden, Helen) *Modified event on 12/16/2024 (KJ).
November 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER setting a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 1/21/2025 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 605, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Diane J Humetewa. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 11/18/2024. (See Order for details.) (LFIG)
November 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 11/18/2024. (LFIG)
November 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting Defendant's first unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (Doc. #4 ). Defendant shall file its answer on or before 12/13/2024. Ordered by Judge Diane J Humetewa. (CR) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)
November 15, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Unopposed) by Nextiva Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Holden, Helen)
November 15, 2024 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-23677326. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Diane J Humetewa. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-03198-PHX-DJH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK)
November 15, 2024 Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by Nextiva Incorporated. (submitted by Helen Holden) (REK)
November 15, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2024-029220. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-23677326 filed by Nextiva Incorporated. (submitted by Helen Holden) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cadena v. Nextiva Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danielle Cadena
Represented By: Michelle Ray Matheson
Represented By: Emily Dierberg Armstrong
Represented By: David Paul Matheson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nextiva Incorporated
Represented By: Robert Mark Warzel
Represented By: Helen Rubenstein Holden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?