Rubalcava v. Penzone et al
William Jose Rubalcava |
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and Maricopa, County of |
2:2025cv00599 |
February 21, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
Alison S Bachus (PS) |
Michael T Liburdi |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by William Jose Rubalcava (5 pages). (DXD) |
Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to William Rubalcava. Reason for return: Released 2/28/25. Document number #2 . (DXD) |
![]() |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (DXD) |
Filing 5 NOTICE re: to the Court by William Jose Rubalcava (5 pages). (DXD) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by William Jose Rubalcava (2 pages). (DXD) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF PARTY'S CHANGE OF ADDRESS by William Jose Rubalcava: 2727 E University Dr, #123, Tempe, AZ 85288 (2 pages). (DXD) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (Attachments: #1 Instructions) (DXD) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by William Jose Rubalcava (11 pages). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.