Goff #186716 v. Arizona, State of et al
| Shawn Charles Goff |
| Arizona, State of, NaphCare and Centurion |
| 2:2025cv01368 |
| April 24, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| James F Metcalf (PS) |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement by NaphCare. (Barnes, Sarah) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTY RE: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to NaphCare. (REK) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (REK) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (Attachments: #1 Instructions) (REK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2024-037775. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-24222314 filed by NaphCare. (submitted by Sarah Barnes) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
