Tropp v. Astrue

Case Number: 3:2006cv00606
Filed: February 28, 2006
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Prescott Division Office
Presiding Judge: Mary H Murguia
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 12, 2012 95 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 90 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees in the amount of $12,590.26. This award shall be made payable directly to Plaintiff and is subject to offset to satisfy any pre-existing debt that Plaintiff owes the United States. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 9/12/12.(TLJ)
March 14, 2012 86 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - IT IS ORDERED reversing the Commissioner and remanding for further proceedings in accordance with this Order. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 3/14/12. (LAD)
February 18, 2011 56 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Defendant Michael J. Astrue's Motion toReopen File for Further Proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Doc. 55).IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 2/16/11.(LAD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tropp v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?