Yazzie v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Leonard Yazzie
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 3:2008cv08059
Filed: May 6, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County: Apache
Presiding Judge: Earl H Carroll
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 30, 2009 27 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Pla's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Dft's 24 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 9/30/09.(SAT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yazzie v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leonard Yazzie
Represented By: Francesca J MacDowell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?