Satala v. Schriro et al
| Robert Daniel Satala |
| Dora B Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of |
| 3:2008cv08137 |
| October 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Pinal |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Mary H Murguia |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 26 . ORDER that the Court has reviewed the pleadings and has determined that a Certificate of Appealability and Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is not appropriate, since Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ORDER that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and dismissed with prejudice. ORDER directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 1/26/10. (TLJ)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying as premature and with leave to refile petitioner's 4 Motion to stay proceedings and hold in abeyance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 8/31/2009. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting 21 Motion for Extension of Time - The Court in its discretion, will allow Petitioner an additional 30 days from the date of his request (June 10, 2009) until July 10, 2009 to file a reply. No further extensions will be granted without a showing of good cause, supported by specific facts demonstrating why in the exercise of due diligence, a reply could not be filed in time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 6/17/09.(KMG, )
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER that Petitioner's Motion 19 for Reconsideration is DENIED; Petitioner, however, shall file his reply to Respondents' Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus no later than June 17, 2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 6/11/09.(KMG, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting in part and denying in part petitioner's 12 Request for Production of Documents. FURTHER ORDERED that respondents provide to petitioner, if available, a copy of the post-conviction docket from the Navajo County Superior Court in Petitioner's case. If a copy of the docket is not available, respondents shall provide petitioner within 10 days of this ORDER with a list of all documents in the State's possession that were filed post-conviction in the Navajo County Supe rior Court, along with the date on which each document was filed. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's request for an extension of time to reply to respondents' answer is granted. Petitioner shall file his reply to respondents' answer no later than 45 days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 3/30/2009. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
