Watkins v. Yavapai County et al
| John M Watkins |
| Yavapai County and Norman Wilson |
| 3:2009cv08059 |
| April 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Yavapai |
| James A Teilborg |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER that Dft Yavapai County's 16 Motion to Dismiss Pla's Amended Complaint is granted. It is further ordered that the Court also dismisses Pla's claims against Dfnt Wilson. It is finally ordered hat the Clerk of the Court shall dismiss this case with prejudice and enter judgment against Pla and for Dft, with Pla to take nothing. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 04/05/10. (ESL)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER that Dft Yavapai County's Motion 8 to Dismiss is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that the Court also dismisses Pla's claims against Dft Wilson. FURTHER ORDERED that Dft Yavapai County's Motion 13 to Strike is denied. FINALLY ORDERED that the Court shall grant leave to file an Amended Complaint no later than 30 days after the date of this Order. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice and without further notice to Pla if Pla fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 11/17/09.(KMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
