Moore-White v. Fann Contracting, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michael Rae Moore-White
Defendant: Fann Contracting, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2009cv08077
Filed: May 6, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Prescott Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER granting 64 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 68 Motion for Summary Judgment. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk enter judgment in favor of dft and that pla take nothing. The Clerk shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 4/29/10.(LAD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore-White v. Fann Contracting, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Rae Moore-White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fann Contracting, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?