Batsford v. SCA Tissue North America, LLC

Plaintiff: Rosalinda V Batsford
Defendant: SCA Tissue North America, LLC
Case Number: 3:2009cv08079
Filed: May 11, 2009
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Prescott Division Office
County: Yuma
Presiding Judge: Paul G Rosenblatt
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 4, 2009 31 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting defendant's motion to withdraw its motion to consider its motion to dismiss timely 21 . The clerk shall withdraw defendant's motion to consider its motion to dismiss timely 17 . ORDER granting defendant's motion to dismiss with prejudice 19 . Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 12/3/09.(TLJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Batsford v. SCA Tissue North America, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosalinda V Batsford
Represented By: Rosemary Stathakis Cook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SCA Tissue North America, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?