Johnson v. Arizona, State of, et al
| Robert Johnson |
| Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Public Safety, A Keith Anderson, Unknown Anderson, K C Clark, Jeff Adams, Unknown Adams, Unknown Parties, Navajo, County of, Brenda Clark, Mark Crandell and Unknown Crandell |
| 3:2010cv08006 |
| January 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| David G Campbell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant Hughess motion for reconsideration (Doc. 107) is granted. 2. The Court's April 18, 2011 order (Doc. 104) is vacated to the extent it denied qualified immunity to Defendant Hughes on Claim 1.3. Summary judgment will be entered in favor of Defendant Hughes on Claim 1.4. The Clerk shall terminate this action. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/23/11.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER - Defendant Anderson's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 92) is granted. Defendant Hughes and Navajo County's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 94) is granted in part and denied in part as stated above. Defendant Navajo County shall be dismissed from the case. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/18/11.(LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
