Bean v. John Wiley & Sons Incorporated
| Tom Bean |
| John Wiley & Sons Incorporated |
| 3:2011cv08028 |
| February 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Coconino |
| Frederick J Martone |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
ORDER granting in part 100 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Summary Judgment is granted to plaintiff on the issue of defendant's liability for copyright infringement for each instance listed in Exhibits A and B to plaintiff's motion . Plaintiff's request for a pre-trial permanent injunction is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED granting 106 defendant's motion to seal. The Clerk shall file the lodged exhibit (doc. 102 ) under seal. FURTHER ORDERED denying 103 defendant's motion to reinforce the protective order on grounds of mootness. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 3/29/12. (MAP)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER denying 99 Plaintiff's Motion to transfer related case CV-12- 08001-PCT-GMS. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 3/14/12.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER denying 91 Motion to Compel. Each party to bear its own costs. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 2/1/2012.(KAR)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER granting Plaintiff's motion to compel keys explaining spreadsheet codes and fees 84 ; Defendant shall provide plaintiff with a key defining all terms contained in Exhibit A to Plaintiff's reply 94 within 5 days; denying Plaintiff's motion to compel production of documents 85 ; each party to bear its own fees and costs. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 1/17/12.(REW)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER, granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 31 Motion to Dismiss; granting defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's claims for copyright infringement with respect to the images contained in the Corbis compilations; denying defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's claims for fraud. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 8/3/11.(REW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bean v. John Wiley & Sons Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tom Bean | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Seidman |
| Represented By: | Maurice James Harmon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Wiley & Sons Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Ashima Aggarwal |
| Represented By: | David Mark Andersen |
| Represented By: | Joseph J Barker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
