Northern Improvement Company et al v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Northern Improvement Company, Alfred Jay Schritter and Tomma Schritter
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 3:2012cv08011
Filed: January 18, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Prescott Division Office
County: Mohave
Presiding Judge: Paul G Rosenblatt
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2409
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 144 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiffs' summary judgment motion (Doc. 134 ) is granted in part and denied in part, and the government's summary judgment motion (Doc. 127 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Judgment will be entered in fa vor of Plaintiff NIC as to NIC's rights to the sand and gravel on the NIC Parcel. Judgement will be entered in favor of the United States as to rights to the sand and gravel on the Schritter Parcel. The parties shall submit proposed forms of judgment within 15 days of this decision. (See document for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 6/10/19. (SLQ)
April 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 141 ORDER. On or before 5/10/2019, the parties shall file memoranda no longer than 10 pages that respond to the Court's order. See order for complete details. The Court will not grant extension to this deadline absent truly extraordinary circumstances. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 4/19/2019. (DGC, nvo)
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 123 ORDER denying 105 Motion to Intervene; finding as moot 116 Motion for Leave to File. Pre-motion for summary judgment hearing set for 12/5/2018 at 2:00 PM. See order for further details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 11/27/2018.(DGC, nvo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Northern Improvement Company et al v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Northern Improvement Company
Represented By: Todd Alan Baxter
Represented By: James T Braselton
Represented By: Charles Steven Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alfred Jay Schritter
Represented By: Todd Alan Baxter
Represented By: James T Braselton
Represented By: Charles Steven Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tomma Schritter
Represented By: Todd Alan Baxter
Represented By: James T Braselton
Represented By: Charles Steven Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?