Elliott v. Arizona Department of Motor Vehicles

Plaintiff: Bartlett Elliott
Defendant: Arizona Department of Motor Vehicles
Case Number: 3:2012cv08153
Filed: July 31, 2012
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Prescott Division Office
County: Coconino
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 18, 2013 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7 ) is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/18/2013.(KMG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elliott v. Arizona Department of Motor Vehicles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bartlett Elliott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona Department of Motor Vehicles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?