Harris v. Monarch Recovery Holdings Incorporated

Plaintiff: Dennis Harris
Defendant: Monarch Recovery Holdings Incorporated
Case Number: 3:2013cv08090
Filed: April 16, 2013
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Prescott Division Office
County: Coconino
Presiding Judge: John W Sedwick
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 23, 2014 35 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER AND OPINION granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion for Attorney's Fees; denying 32 Motion for discovery and an evidentiary hearing. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 3/17/14.(JWS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Monarch Recovery Holdings Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monarch Recovery Holdings Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dennis Harris
Represented By: Ryan Scott Lee(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?