Benally v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Plaintiff: Samuel Benally
Defendant: Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Case Number: 3:2013cv08096
Filed: April 17, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Prescott Division Office
County: Coconino
Presiding Judge: Paul G Rosenblatt
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 25 U.S.C. ยง 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER denying 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 22 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. (See document for full details). Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 2/10/14. (LAD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benally v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samuel Benally
Represented By: Jeremiah Todd Oster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?