Eddy #053476 v. Ryan et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 2, 2016
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 102 ) is accepted. Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because dismissal of the second amended petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and reasonable jurists would not find the procedural ruling debatable and because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. denying Petitioner's Motio n to Submit a Second Supplement Reply to the Respondent's Answer Due to the Most Recent AttemptedMurder of Petitioner'S Life (Doc. 105 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying and dismissing petitioner's Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 22 ) with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 05/02/16. (GAR)
|September 9, 2015
ORDER accepting Report and Recommendations 47 .... IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court denies Petitioner's Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order. (Doc. 40 .) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court construes Petitioner's Motion for Dec laratory Relief (Doc. 39 ) as a motion to supplement the Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and grants that motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court denies Petitioner's motions for expedited ruling on his Motion for Declaratory Relief and Motion for Relief from Judgment. (Docs. 41 , 42 .) (See document for full details). Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 9/8/15.(LAD)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?