Stack v. Colvin

Plaintiff: William Timothy Stack
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Case Number: 3:2015cv08063
Filed: April 27, 2015
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Prescott Division Office
County: Apache
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 5, 2016 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees pursuant to the EAJA (Doc. 15 ) is GRANTED to the extent it seeks $6,638.80 in attorneys' fees and $400.00 in costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The mot ion is DENIED to the extent it requests that the fees be made payable directly to Plaintiff's counsel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this award shall be made payable directly to Plaintiff and is subject to offset to satisfy any pre-existing debt that Plaintiff owes the United States pursuant to Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 7/5/2016. (KAL)
October 14, 2015 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER OF REMAND AND JUDGMENT - that the above-captioned case is REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the Appeals Council will direct an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) as follows. The ALJ will reevaluate whether Plaintiff's medically determinable impairments meet or equal the requirements of any listing at step 3 of the sequential evaluation process, including Listing 12.05C, with further discussion of w hether Plaintiff has deficits in adaptive functioning. In so doing, the ALJ will consult an appropriate medical expert and offer Plaintiff the opportunity to address the medical expert's opinion. If warranted, the ALJ will reevaluate Plaintiff&# 039;s maximum residual functional capacity pursuant to Social Security Ruling 96-8p; obtain supplemental vocational expert evidence at step 4; and, if necessary proceed to step 5 of the sequential evaluation process. The ALJ will consider any new evi dence submitted and issue a new decision. Upon proper presentation to this Court, Plaintiff will be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT is entered for Plaintiff, and this case is closed. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 10/14/2015. (KMG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stack v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Timothy Stack
Represented By: Tye Sherman Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Represented By: Lisa Goldoftas(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Represented By: Michael A Johns(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?