Cook v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Becky Lee Cook
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Case Number: 3:2015cv08158
Filed: August 27, 2015
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Prescott Division Office
County: Yavapai
Presiding Judge: Eileen S Willett
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 22, 2016 32 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security and remanding for further administrative proceedings. The ALJ shall issue a new decision that is consistent with the applicable law as set forth in this Order. The Clerk shall enter judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 7/21/16. (LSP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cook v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Becky Lee Cook
Represented By: Fay Ellen Fishman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Represented By: Michael A Johns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?