Lee v. USA
Petitioner: Duane Thomas Lee
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 3:2016cv08138
Filed: June 24, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Prescott Division Office
County: Apache
Presiding Judge: James F Metcalf (PS)
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER that the Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 58 in CR-05-00594-PCT-JAT) is denied and the civil action opened in connection with this Motion (CV-16-08138- PCT-JAT) is dismis sed with prejudice and the clerk of court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because denial of the Motion is based on a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find this Court's procedural rulings debatable.. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 10/9/18. (GMP)
March 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER rejecting 23 Report and Recommendation. FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is re-referred to Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a further report and recommendation. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/27/18. (EJA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?