Bernardo v. Ryan et al
| Bernardo and Arenas Bernardo |
| Ryan, Charles L Ryan, Michael Linderman, George Zoley, Edward Coday and Mark Shipman |
| 3:2017cv08067 |
| April 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Mohave |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Diane J Humetewa |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's Order filed April 24, 2017, judgment of dismissal is entered. Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice. (DXD) |
Filing 3
ORDER - Plaintiff's "Petition for Temporary Restraining Order and PertinentInjunction" (Doc. #1 ) is denied without prejudice. The Clerk shall close this case. The Clerk shall mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner and a court-approved form for filing an application to proceed in forma pauperis (non-habeas). Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 4/21/17. (DXD)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (ATD) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT titled as "Petition for Temporary Restraining Order and Pertinent Injunction" (TRO Requested & Preliminary Injunction Requested) filed by Arenas Bernardo. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ATD) (6 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
