Schaffer v. Hooten et al
| George W Schaffer |
| Larry Hooten and Daniel Morales |
| 3:2017cv08150 |
| July 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Yavapai |
| Michelle H Burns |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER denying 51 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court will hold a telephonic conference to set trial and final pretrial conference dates on January 25, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. Counsel for Defendants shall initiate a conference call to include Plai ntiff, counsel for Defendants, and the Court. If a dial-in number is to be used, counsel for Defendants shall provide an email to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendants, and the Court with the dial-in information no later than January 23, 2019 at noon. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 1/11/19. (SJF)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER: Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 24 ) is granted with respect to claims based on 18 U.S.C. § 242, A.R.S. §§ 13-1204 and 13-2412, Fourth Amendment excessive force, the Fifth Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment, and procedural due process. The motion is denied with respect to the Fourth Amendment Terry stop and false arrest claims. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/5/18. (EJA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
