Mihaylo et al v. Russell-Jenkins et al
Petitioner: Emily Noelle Mihaylo and James Joseph Knochel
Respondent: Shane Russell-Jenkins, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Amy Fackrell and John C Morris
Case Number: 3:2018cv08004
Filed: January 11, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Prescott Division Office
County: Yavapai
Presiding Judge: John Z Boyle (PS)
Referring Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2018 Filing 16 NOTICE/Letter by James Joseph Knochel. (4 pages) (EJA)
December 27, 2018 Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT re: #14 Notice by Petitioner James Joseph Knochel. (5 pages) (EJA)
December 17, 2018 Filing 14 NOTICE re: #8 Motion to Dismiss Case by Emily Noelle Mihaylo. (2 pages) (REK)
December 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER denying #12 Mr. Knochel's "Motion to Seal Case." This case must remain closed. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 12/10/18. (EJA)
April 13, 2018 Filing 12 MOTION to Seal Case by James Joseph Knochel. (SLQ)(2 pages).
February 7, 2018 Filing 11 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's Order filed February 7, 2018, judgment of dismissal is entered. Petitioners to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. (LAD)
February 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER - (1) The Petition for Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1 ) and this case are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. (2) The "Motion for Ex-Parte Evidentiary Hearing in Support of 'Next Friend,' and for a Temporary Restraining Order" (Doc. #2 ), Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #3 ) and Motion to Dismiss Case (Doc. #8 ) are denied as moot. (3) Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). (See document for further details). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/7/18. (LAD)
January 26, 2018 Filing 9 RESPONSE to #8 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by James Joseph Knochel. (LAD) (6 pages)
January 24, 2018 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Emily Noelle Mihaylo. (LAD) (1 page, styled as a letter to the Court)
January 11, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (SLQ)
January 11, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (SLQ)
January 11, 2018 Filing 5 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by James Joseph Knochel. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (SLQ)
January 11, 2018 Filing 4 BRIEF ("Trial Brief of Petitioners: Exhaustion of State Remedies") by Petitioners James Joseph Knochel, Emily Noelle Mihaylo. (SLQ) (14 pages).
January 11, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by James Joseph Knochel, Emily Noelle Mihaylo. (SLQ) (6 pages).
January 11, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Ex-Parte Evidentiary Hearing, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by James Joseph Knochel, Emily Noelle Mihaylo. (SLQ) (3 pages).
January 11, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number PHX192843 filed by Emily Noelle Mihaylo, James Joseph Knochel.(SLQ) (42 pages).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mihaylo et al v. Russell-Jenkins et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Shane Russell-Jenkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Amy Fackrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John C Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Emily Noelle Mihaylo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Joseph Knochel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?