Moore v. Shinn et al
| Jeffrey Aaron Moore and Maddi |
| David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 3:2020cv08284 |
| November 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Morrissey (PS) |
| Michael T Morrissey |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Substitution by Jennifer Londono Holder. (Holder, Jennifer) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Receipt of Electronic Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Arizona Attorney General on 12/17/20. The Attorney General's Office will file a Notice of Appearance within five (5) business days that identifies the respondents that are represented or, in the alternative, will notify the Court if the Attorney General is not able to accept service for and/or represent any of the named respondents. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (Nielsen, Jim) |
Filing 9
Arizona Attorney General Service Order (2254): Petitioner's December 14, 2020 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #8 ) is denied as moot. The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Amended Petition (Doc. #7 ) and this Order on the Respondent(s) and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by electronic mail pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, and the Memorandum of Understanding between the United States District Clerk of Court for the District of Arizona and the Arizona Attorney General's Office. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michael T. Morrissey pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 12/17/20. (Attachments: #1 Amended Petition Part 1, #2 Amended Petition Part 2, #3 Amended Petition Part 3, #4 Amended Petition Part 4) (SST)
|
| Filing 8 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jeffrey Aaron Moore. (SST) (3 pages) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Jeffrey Aaron Moore. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4) (SST) (189 pages) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is granted. Petitioner's Motion to Amend (Doc. #5 ) is denied as moot. Petitioner's 2254 Petition (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date of filing of this Order to file an amended 2254 petition in compliance with this Order. If Petitioner fails to file an amended petition within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 12/1/20. (SLQ)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Amend #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) by Jeffrey Aaron Moore. (SLQ) (6 pages). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SST) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jeffrey Aaron Moore. (SST) (4 pages) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jeffrey Aaron Moore. (SST) (2 pages) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Jeffrey Aaron Moore. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6, #6 Envelope) (SST) (305 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
