Shirley v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
| Samuel Shirley |
| Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation |
| 3:2023cv08101 |
| June 2, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Deborah M Fine |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 25 U.S.C. ยง 640 Indian Tribal Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Samuel Shirley: Proof of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Merrick Garland, U.S. Atty General on 07/24/2023. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proof of Service)(Eastman, Susan) |
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Samuel Shirley: Proof of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Gary Restaino US Atty Dist of AZ on 07/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Returned Cert Mail Card)(Eastman, Susan) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER: That counsel having complied with this Court's Order, the Order to Show Cause Hearing scheduled for July 24, 2023 is hereby VACATED. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 7 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 5
ORDER that Samuel Shirley show cause for failure to comply with LRCiv 3.7(b) before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. Show Cause Hearing set for 7/24/2023 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. (Attachments: #1 Instructions, #2 Consent Form)(MAP)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(SCA). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21971031. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Deborah M Fine. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-08101-PCT-DMF. Magistrate Election form attached. (SCA) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Samuel Shirley. (Eastman, Susan) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(SCA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21971031 filed by Samuel Shirley. (Eastman, Susan) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shirley v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Samuel Shirley | |
| Represented By: | Susan Ingrid Eastman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
