Galligan v. Barnhart
| 4:2006cv00657 |
| December 23, 2006 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Hector C Estrada |
| Frank R Zapata |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 25 Report and Recommendation, 14 granting Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Isabel Galligan, to the extent this matter is remanded for further proceedings 20 denying Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Jo Anne B. Barnhart. This case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Report & Recommendation which has been accepted and adopted by the Court. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. *****SEE ATTACHED PDF FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION.******. Signed by Judge Frank R Zapata on 9/1/09. (KDT, )
|
|
Filing
25
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 14 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment : Recommending that granting 14, denying 20; written objections due w/in 10 days, using 06cv657-TUC-FRZ. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hector C Estrada on 5/29/09. (KMF, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Galligan v. Barnhart | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
