Galligan v. Barnhart

Case Number: 4:2006cv00657
Filed: December 23, 2006
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
Referring Judge: Hector C Estrada
Presiding Judge: Frank R Zapata
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 2, 2009 29 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 25 Report and Recommendation, 14 granting Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Isabel Galligan, to the extent this matter is remanded for further proceedings 20 denying Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Jo Anne B. Barnhart. This case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Report & Recommendation which has been accepted and adopted by the Court. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. *****SEE ATTACHED PDF FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION.******. Signed by Judge Frank R Zapata on 9/1/09. (KDT, )
June 1, 2009 25 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 14 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment : Recommending that granting 14, denying 20; written objections due w/in 10 days, using 06cv657-TUC-FRZ. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hector C Estrada on 5/29/09. (KMF, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Galligan v. Barnhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?