Campbell, et al v. Fernand-Sholes, et al
Kathleen C Campbell, Capitol Enquiry Inc and Capitol Education, Inc. |
Jane Doe Kubasch, Law Office of Bruce Sholes and Does 2-20 |
4:2007cv00248 |
May 30, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
P.I.: Other Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Frank R Zapata |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 ORDER granting 68 Motion to Change Venue/Transfer Case from the Phoenix Division of the U.S. Dist Court, Dist of AZ to the Tucson Div FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be transferred to the Tucson Div of the U.S. District Court, Dist of AZ and that the case shall be assigned to a District Court Judge by random draw. (CV 05-880-PHX-SMM transferred to Tucson Div, New Case No. CV 0248-TUC-FRZ). Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 5/25/07.(MAP) |
Filing 71 ORDER granting 67 Motion to Appear Telephonically at the May 23, 2007 Preliminary Pretrial Conference. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference has been changed to a Status Conference to discuss the motions pending befo re the Court and the default against Bruce A. Sholes. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that parties shall contact each other and call the Court on one clear telephone line at 3:55 p.m. Mountain Standard Time at 602-322-7555. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 5/21/07.(LCF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.