Scales v. Chavez
Petitioner: Anthony Scales
Respondent: Ricardo Chavez
Case Number: 4:2007cv00451
Filed: September 10, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: David C Bury
Presiding Judge: Pro Se (Tucson)
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 5, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 16 Report and Recommendations.. Ordered 2241 Petition 1 is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and Clerk of Court directed to send a copy of this Order to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals and USDC for Eastern District of VA. Signed by Judge David C Bury on 9/5/08.(SSU, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scales v. Chavez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony Scales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ricardo Chavez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?