Buck v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Christopher Buck
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 4:2009cv00145
Filed: March 15, 2009
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Hector C Estrada
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 1, 2010 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER re 17 REPLY re 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 16 BRIEF, Opposition to 15 Pla's Opening Brief filed by Michael J. Astrue. 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Christopher Buck. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hector C Estrada on 6/30/10. Commissioner's final decision is REMANDED for proper evaluation of Dr. Rastatter's report and reconsideration of the denial of benefits.(SMBE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Buck v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Buck
Represented By: David Anaise
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?